Pengaruh Kompetensi Pedagogik Dan Motivasi Ekstrinsik Terhadap Kinerja Guru
Studi Kasus Pada Salah Satu Sekolah Dasar Negeri di Kota Bandung
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55208/jxr9r710Keywords:
Pedagogic Competence, Extrinsic Motivation, Teacher PerformanceAbstract
This study was conducted with the aim to determine the effect of pedagogic competence and extrinsic motivation on performance and this study also aims to analyze the most dominant factor influencing pedagogic competence and extrinsic motivation on teacher performance.
This research method uses descriptive and verification methods in pedagogic competence and extrinsic motivation on teacher performance in an effort to obtain data and information that will support this research by taking the object of research as many as 30 teachers using a questionnaire aimed at teachers at one of the State Elementary Schools. in the city of Bandung.
Based on the results of research using path analysis, it can be seen that the pedagogic competence variable (X1) has a direct influence of 25.9%, an indirect effect through the relationship of extrinsic motivation (X2) of 16.1%, and a total effect of 42%. Extrinsic motivation (X2) has a direct effect of 17.9% and an indirect effect through pedagogic competence (X1) of 16.1%, a total effect of 34%. The results of the correlation coefficient of determination (Rsquare) expressed in percentages describe the magnitude of the contribution of all independent variables, namely pedagogic competence (X1), and extrinsic motivation (X2) in determining the teacher performance variable, which is 0.760 or 76% while other factors that do not affect performance do not. studied is indicated by the value of = 0.240 or 24%.
The conclusions and suggestions obtained are considered in connection with the results of the study, namely that management should be able to maintain and improve the two variables above.
References
Akhtar, J. H., & Iqbal, I. (2017). Impact of motivation on teachers’ job performance: a case study of a public sector university. Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(1), 54-72.
Andriani, S., Kesumawati, N., & Kristiawan, M. (2018). The influence of the transformational leadership and work motivation on teachers performance. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 7(7), 19-29.
Gemmink, M. M., Fokkens-Bruinsma, M., Pauw, I., & van Veen, K. (2021). How contextual factors influence teachers’ pedagogical practices. Educational Research, 63(4), 396-415.
Hakim, A. (2015). Contribution of competence teacher (pedagogical, personality, professional competence and social) on the performance of learning. The International Journal of Engineering and Science, 4(2), 1-12.
König, J., & Pflanzl, B. (2016). Is teacher knowledge associated with performance? On the relationship between teachers’ general pedagogical knowledge and instructional quality. European Journal of Teacher Education, 39(4), 419-436.
Luthans, F., Luthans, B. C., & Luthans, K. W. (2021). Organizational Behavior: An Evidence-Based Approach Fourteenth Edition. IAP: USA.
Mulyasa, H. E. (2021). Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 Revisi: Dalam Era Industri 4.0. Bumi Aksara: Bandung.
Murkatik, K., Harapan, E., & Wardiah, D. (2020). The influence of professional and pedagogic competence on teacher’s performance. Journal of Social Work and Science Education, 1(1), 58-69.
Phytanza, D. T. P., & Burhaein, E. (2020). The effects of tenure, teacher certification, and work motivation on special needs teacher performance. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(9), 4348-4356.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary educational psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Diana Firmansyah, Farid Riadi, Ujang Wawan Sam Adinata, Asep Rochyadi Suherman (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.







